Design a way to make toast. Ensure a modular solution that can be expanded by end users such that the intervention is suitable for households of between 1 and 4 persons. Pay particular attention to the needs of disabled persons, and environmental concerns.
Develop a PRS for this situation. A summary PSS is provided below for this workshop; use it as the basis for your team's PRS.
In particular, and following the design roadmap section for Project Initialization, your team must:
This section provides a summary Strategy that would have been carried out for this project. It is not a complete PSS, but should contain all the necessary information you need for this workshop.
This is the result of a situation scan.
Helander [1] was used to find information about user abilities, dimensions, etc.
Searches of “ways to make toast” and “ways to cook toast” both on Google and Google Scholar yielded no useful results. The only clear sources of information involved “toasters.”
A Google search for “toaster” yielded the following exemplary products. We expect that Google results will be indicative of the most popular and modern currently available toasters.
We compared prices of the same model of toaster at 2-3 different websites and found they were all within 5-10% of each other with discount stores like WallMart having slightly lower prices than other stores like Hudson’s Bay (excluding short-term “sales events,” where price differences were greater).
When searching for “toaster,” Google suggested other searches. “Toaster oven” was the only other search for a product class. However, we understood from the brief that the focus is on toast only rather than the more expansive function set of “toaster ovens.” We therefore limited research strictly to the making of toast, and not other uses of toaster ovens.
We also searched Google for “modular toaster.” Though there were many hits, all of them seemed to be “concepts” - i.e., not actual products on the market. Some exemplars include the following.
A Google search for “innovative toasters” yielded many strange designs, none of which were currently feasible either because they were:
The Wikipedia entry for toasters led us to a Consumer Report [10] which provided a list of features of different types of toasters. This list will be used to help guide Concept Design. Of the features listed, cleanliness and ease of operation were systemic to all toaster types. Modularity and universal usability were not listed at all.
Having searched for various “toaster technologies,” we found that resistance heating was the only technology used to make toast.
We chose the Cuisinart toaster [3] as our reference design for the following reasons:
Middle-class blue- and white-collar families in North America, with emphasis on disabled individuals. Given our experiences with toasters and our review of available products, we believe vision, hand/wrist, and cognitive impairments will be most significant.
Innovation focus is on energy conservation and ease of cleaning. Modularity and inclusivity were not listed as features of any type of toaster in [10]. This suggests an opportunity to establish a new product sub-class by simply addressing modularity and inclusivity.
All else being equal, keep complexity as low as possible; no bells and whistles. This will help lower complexity and cost, which will hopefully have knock-on effects on sustainability.
We believe 12 months to market is sufficient for design, test, and ramp-up, assuming sufficient corporate resources for all detailed design and life-cycle considerations are available.
Full production is 5,000 per year, with a possibility of increasing production if the product is a success.
Ease of cleaning is very important, especially cleaning the inside of the device. The exterior should be easy to keep clean of sticky food particles that could rot, and easy to keep dry so mould doesn't form.
We were unable to determine what an appropriate level of profitability would be. However, we cannot sell the product at a loss. We will attempt to optimize for lower cost, constrained by other goals of functionality, usability, and durability.
It appears that some functional innovation will be needed to satisfy the design brief. As such, there is increased risk of the product failing in the market because it will be seen as “too different.” To offset this, focus groups and careful concept testing will be used to direct the design appropriately. Also, production ramp-up will be slower than usual, with special attention paid to warranty issues. This should help minimize economic risk to the company.
See Profitability.
The only aspect of customization arises from modularity in that users must be able to alter the number of food items that the device can toast at once. This will not be a frequent operation, possibly happening once or twice per year at most.
We conducted an informal survey of 15 family members and friends on this question. While all respondents believed customization would be a desirable feature for them, only 12 of 15 respondents indicated they would configure the toaster no more than once or twice during its usable lifetime.
One report per team describing the PRS as described in the design roadmap.
Your report will be graded according this rubric as well as this HF Matrix.